Supercharging in (S.I.) Engines - Technical Deep Dive

  Naturally Aspirated (NA) Cycle of Operation

• Process:

  1. Intake Stroke: Air-fuel mixture enters at atmospheric pressure (~1 bar).

  2. Compression Stroke: Mixture is compressed (CR: 8:1 to 12:1).

  3. Power Stroke: Spark plug ignites mixture, expanding gases.

  4. Exhaust Stroke: Burnt gases exit at near-atmospheric pressure.

• PV Diagram:

• Shows a narrow loop with lower peak pressure (limited by ambient air density).

• Work output per cycle = Area enclosed by the cycle.

2. Actual NA vs. Supercharged Engine Comparison

Parameter	Naturally Aspirated	Supercharged
Intake Pressure	~1 bar (atm)	1.5–2.5 bar (boosted)
Air Density	Lower	Higher (more O₂ molecules)
Volumetric Efficiency	70–90%	100–150% (forced induction)
Power Output	Limited by displacement	+30–50% (or more)
Thermal Efficiency	Higher (no parasitic loss)	Slightly lower (energy to drive SC)

 Thermodynamic Cycle & Supercharging Power Otto Cycle Modifications:

• Increased 𝑃₃ (peak pressure): More air/fuel → Higher expansion work.

• Higher 𝑇₃ (combustion temp): Requires premium fuel (higher octane).

• Power Gain Equation:

  $$\text{Power Increase}\approx \frac{{�}_{\text{boost}}}{{�}_{\text{atm}}}\times \text{NA Power}$$

  • Example: 1.5 bar boost → ~50% more power.

• Parasitic Loss: Supercharger consumes 5–15% of engine power.

Key Points on Supercharging S.I. Engines

1. Knocking Risk:

   • Higher pressure/temperature can cause pre-ignition (requires high-octane fuel).

2. Heat Management:

   • Intercoolers must reduce intake air temp (↓ detonation risk).

3. Fuel Enrichment:

   • Extra fuel is often injected to cool combustion chambers.

4. Compression Ratio (CR):

   • Supercharged engines typically run lower CR (e.g., 8:1 vs. 11:1 NA).

5. Emissions:

   • Higher NOx due to increased combustion temps (may need EGR).

---

 Supercharging Limits in S.I. Engines

• Knocking Threshold:

  • Practical boost limit: ~1.5–2.0 bar (varies with fuel octane and cooling).

• Material Strength:

  • Pistons/rods must handle higher peak pressures.

• Thermal Stress:

  • Exhaust valves and turbo components face extreme heat.

• Fuel Quality:

  • Low-octane fuel severely limits boost potential.

---

Summary Table: Supercharging vs. NA S.I. Engines

Aspect	Naturally Aspirated	Supercharged
Peak Power	Limited by displacement	+30–50% typical
Throttle Response	Good	Instant (vs. turbo lag)
Efficiency	Higher (no parasitic loss)	Lower (SC consumes power)
Knocking Risk	Low	High (requires mitigation)
Cost	Lower	Higher (hardware + tuning)

---

Final Notes

• Supercharging trades efficiency for power density.

• Best for applications where low-end torque and throttle response are critical (e.g., drag racing, muscle cars).

• Modern solutions combine supercharging + turbocharging (e.g., Volvo’s Twin-Charged engines).